On 13 Jan 2001, at 10:39, Howard Schwartz wrote:
> I notice almost a complete absence (blackout?) of any mention of Free BSD
> Unix, in discussions of OS's for the PC. Free BSD, unlike Linux, is free
> but controls its software upgrades by a system of submissions to a work
> group, etc.
>
> Consequently, many have told me Free BSD is generally more stable than
> Linux, and it has gone to some length to be ``Linux'' friendly. That is,
> if one can port a program to Linux, there is a 99% chance it will also
> run on Free BSD.
Only proprietary, no-source-avaliable programs will not run on *bsd.
>
> However, I have only tried Phat Linux and not personally downloaded Free
> BSD. Anyone out there tried Free BSD?
>
I am fasing out my Linux servers in favor of *bsd. I find I am having
to recompile/reconfigure my system all to often to accomodate my
needs. I will probably support linux on my client end and in special
circumstances(looking into setting up the kernel driven http server
from redhat).
joe
When asked if Lars and the other metallica memebers ever violated anothers
intellectual property and copyright: "Yeah, I mean I think we answered that
before. Of course we have, ok? And of course it's a valid point."
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
