---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:22:18 +0000
From: "L-Soft list server at SOFTCON.COM (1.8c)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andrew Geoghegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Rejected posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your message  is being returned to  you unprocessed because it  appears to have
already been distributed to the SURVPC  list. That is, a message with identical
text (but  possibly with different  mail headers) has  been posted to  the list
recently, either by you or by someone else. If you have a good reason to resend
this message  to the  list (for instance  because you have  been notified  of a
hardware failure with  loss of data), please  alter the text of  the message in
some way and resend  it to the list. Note that altering  the "Subject:" line or
adding blank lines at  the top or bottom of the message  is not sufficient; you
should  instead add  a  sentence or  two  at  the top  explaining  why you  are
resending the  message, so that the  other subscribers understand why  they are
getting two copies of the same message.

------------------------ Rejected message (85 lines) --------------------------
Received: from postal.netaxs.com (postal.netaxs.com [207.8.186.39])
        by softcon.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA17557
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:22:17 GMT
Received: from unix2.netaxs.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [207.8.186.4])
        by postal.netaxs.com (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id f6E2Me0e028189;
        Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:22:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from geoghega@localhost)
          by unix2.netaxs.com (8.8.7/8.8.4)
          id WAA14790; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:21:10 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:21:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: ANDY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [pctoolbin] Re: XP and activation (fwd)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 11:28:58 GMT
From: "S.M.Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [pctoolbin] Re: XP and activation


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 7/8/01, 12:53:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding
[pctoolbin] Digest Number 744:

>In theory, you could install XP, leave your machine on continuously, and
never
> activate -- and given how stable the system is, I suspect there are
> people who would do exactly that.
>  Several other things were pointed out.  One, activation can be done by
> phone as well as over the Internet in the event you don't have a
> working connection.  The process takes about five to ten minutes tops
> (someone I knew online went through the process and reported that this
> is about right; it took him about five minutes to get going).  Also,
> there is no limit to the number of times a given copy can be activated
> on one machine.  If you're tearing down and rebuilding a given machine
> over and over again, you don't get penalized for re-reactivating it.


In theory, no way.  It goes by days, not by usage. Now, Office XP (and
Office2k after SP1)gives you 40x before you have to activate and in
theory, you could just keep all of Office XP up all the time and never
activate (but who would and can??) But WinXP goes off the system
clock/calendar from what I can see. (My system runs 24/7)   And yes, the
process doesn't take long to activate it by phone, but it does become a
hassle when you legitimately reinstall repeatedly ( I do a lot of Beta
testing, etc.)!  I still think this Activation is going to come back and
sting MS in the long run.

BTW, if you are getting a copy of WinXP that doesn't have activation it
must be a very early beta and probably not worth the bother.  There have
been numerous changes between Beta 1 and 2 and then between Beta 2 and
RC1 are pretty substantial.  Even Beta 2 is a very limited product.  If
you want to test or sneak a peek, then fork over $20 to MS and have them
mail you a CD of RC1.  Only then will you get an accurate picture of what
WinXP will be like.  The betas lack so many drivers and application
compatability. (and whatever you do, do a clean install! Don't "upgrade"
even from Win2k!)


And while you at it.  Download and burn for free or pick up a copy of
Linux Mandrake 8.0 for $40 and play with that for a while! (I've also
used SuSE 6-7.1, RH 7.1, Corel, etc., but Mandrake beats them hands down)
 Have fun!

Sean M. Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
APCServices - A+, MCP2k
Technician, Consultant, Reseller
1-800-416-4971


Visit http://www.datadepo.com to purchase the world's best PC Diagnostic and Recovery 
tools.  Visit http://ld.net?datadepotinc for dirt-cheap long distance rates and low 
prices on  telecom equipment and services.

To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit 
http://unsub.pcdiag.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html

Reply via email to