IIRC, the PDP 9 was a six bit, and devilishly complex
to machine code. The subtlety was elegant.

The 8 bit Apple/Franklin had a well developed assembly
language, but what really impressed me was seeing text
on a screen.

The 16 bit PC put the text up here in color and added
the IBM box characters to organize datafields.

But if you what you are doing is reading and writing
text, 32 or 64 bits dont add anything but complexity.

The inherited primate part of the human brain responds
well to color (fruit), which is why 'red ink' dated
from long before computers. But using the GUI to add
texture that looks like watermarked 40 pound bond does
look nice, but adds nothing whatever to the content of
the text. If it did, Books would have used that long
ago. But the fact is that books are still being printed
on plain white paper and black ink because it is a good
way to deliver content.

A 32bit book would have 4000 pages rather than 250. The
reason it does not, has more to do with organizing that
much content, which has more to do with the capability
of the human brain to deal with information. which has
a lot to do with why the 64bit operating system ads all
talk about full motion graphics. (which aint text)

Replacing 'del' with the trashcan icon is intuitive
and works in many more languages. But it aint faster.
And the set of icons users are confronted with now
looks a lot like the ancient Chinese ideographs, and
at the rate they are proliferating, will require the
same steep learning curve that they were trying to
avoid using icons in the first place.

The ancient dos system of ANSI pulldowns used text on
every line to describe what that choice did. This did
require a different menu for every language, so I can
see why the app developers wanted the GUI icons. But
let's face it; there are enough users who know how to
read English that they would be a large enough niche
market for developers to see profit in servicing.

So far, I dont see anything to replace text as a tool
to deliver content any time soon; to be sure there's
times when a picture is worth a thousand words, but
there's also times when pictures wont get it across.
In fact, as we see with election campaign video, the
pictures are used to obfuscate. There's a reason the
lawyers depend on text.

And if what you are going to deliver is text, you do
not need more than 16bit; the human brain simply can
not deal with more complexity than that. Imagine a
32 bit alphabet of 16,000 characters. ;-}

To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html

Reply via email to