Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
> 
> ZDNet has compared Linux and NT as fileserver and webserver on
> identical machines.
> 
> http://www.zdnet.com/sr/stories/issue/0,4537,387506,00.html
> 
> I quote:
> 
> "You might think that Linux would operate at a disadvantage here, but
> Linux kicks NT's butt. Only at the lightest loads does NT hold any
> advantage over the Linuxes. Once the load moves to 12 clients, all the
> Linux platforms take commanding leads over NT."

I knew it all the time!
> 
> "Linux with Apache beats NT 4.0 with IIS, hands down. SuSE, the least
> effective Linux, is 16 percent faster than IIS, and Caldera, the leader,
> is 50 percent faster. "
> 
> Hm, "SusE, the least effective Linux"???

Nah, must be a typo... ;=)

-- 
        / Tina
        E-MAIL mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        URL    http://www8.tripnet.se/~chjo/
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html

Reply via email to