On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 04:32:07PM -0800, George Schoelles wrote:
>
> However, from the comments I've seen on all of the list's as to the quality
> of the 2.2.x kernel and the trouble being had with SuSE 6.0 I'll be waiting
> till I hear of a revision that is not so broken. Hell, I have a broken 95
> desktop for my kids, I don't need a *nix one for me.
I really don't understand this perception that 6.0 is broken.
Every case I've seen discussed here turns out to be some absence of choice
during installation or lack of understanding of what is needed to make it
work.
Personally, I upgraded my workstation at the office because I didn't want to
experiment with the home workstation with sound and all, and my 5.3 system
upgraded to 6.0 just fine.
So... what's broken about it?
I'm clueless...... `*8)
--
Brad Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Line Exchange http://ole.net
Detroit News http://detnews.com
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
