Jerry Lynn Kreps wrote:
>
> zentara wrote:
>
> > OS2 was better than NT, as far as operation goes. It's only
> > drawback was that it was a single user system, and did not
>
> Zentara,
> Did you see that story on CNN about NT 2000 having 25 million NEW lines
> of code (80% of the entire source) and that MOST of the existing apps
> will have to be ***rewritten*** to run on it?
>
> Amazing. M$ and it's monopolistic co-conspiritors think that people
> will sit still while they are forced shell out big bucks to replace WinX
> with NT 2XXX and more big bucks to replace existing apps with identical
> ones that run under NT 2XXX. I don't think so.
>
> If people thought 1998 was the year Linux got noticed, wait till 1999 is
> over and we look back and the MASSIVE ground swell of change that
> occured.
You must have a great mind! Thanks for being so creative and keeping it
CLEAN!
Cutting edge, just like Linux!
> Shift happens!
> -
> To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
> Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
> archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
