Greg,
I have a dual boot NT/Linux box that takes several times longer to boot into NT than
into Linux. Loggoing in and out are equally more snappy on Linux, as is just about
everything else such as opening applications. I just rebootted an NT server hard
and it _did not_ run chkdsk when it came back up, and it seemed to boot normally
without the extra file system varification we expiernece with Linux.
Steve
Greg Thomas wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Karsten Johansson wrote:
>
> >
> > For the clustering thing, I agree that their information is incorrect.
> >
> > But Linux does take a long long time to boot if it is cold-rebooted. If
> > you hit the power switch on an NT box, it takes the same amount of time to
> > boot as it does if you didn't do that. And the file structure remains intact,
> > save for files that may have been opened prior to the reboot.
> >
>
> I keep hearing this but unless I'm doing something wrong our NT boxes take
> just as long as Linux to reboot when they're shutdown improperly. Here NT
> always runs chkdsk in this case which takes just as long as fsck on same
> size partitions.
>
> > Linux forces a file system check and has lots of things to fix when this
> > occurs. On a large drive with lots of files, this takes a *really* long time.
> >
>
> Greg
--
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
