Actually, X was slow, but not *that* bad considering I was using KDE 1.0
at the time, which is known to be a resource hog. Compiling takes about
twice as long as my Pentium 90 did with 32 megs of RAM (as opposed to the
100's 16 megs), but then again, my kernel config file was *tweaked*out*.
So far, I've checked all imaginable BIOS settings, to no avail. I'm think-
ing about replacing the cache on the board, maybe that's it. It's good to
packrat things like cache chips, you never know when you're gonna' need 'em
:)
-=|JP|=-
On Wed, 21 April 1999, Keith Snape wrote:
>
>
> Does it also seem to take a lifetime and a half to
> start up X, or take hours to compile the kernel (or
> are those just symptoms I'm afflicted with? :) ). And
> if you know of any way to get around that, I'd
> appreciate the help ALOT :)
-=|JP|=-
________________________________________
That's the Weekly (Funny) Farm Report from Kansas City.
Keep us posted on events there. Under 21 not eligible to
win. See inside for details. Do not use this email near
open flames. Keep this email out of reach of small chil-
dren. Do not tease, taunt, or otherwise aggrivate this
email. If burning of the eyes, redness of the skin, or ex-
cessive hair loss is experienced after reading this email,
seek medical attention eventually.
--
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
