Kristian Farren wrote:
>
> Anybody else see this article,
> http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/dailynews/042199.htm
> This seems to refute the bencmarking done by ZDNEt
> a few month ago. Who's right? or does it just show that,
> benchmarks like statistics, can be twisted to your advantage.
> --
I saw an article on LinuxToday (yesterday) which documented the email
header trail that was on the email from Mindcraft that asked for help in
configuring the Linux server. They claimed no help was given, but on
the same day an email response was posted which gave instructions on
what to do and what to avoid. Mindcraft chose to use the settings which
were advised against.
The email header trail: it showed that the message came from an internal
server on the microsoft.com campus, and was sent using "IE5 beta ITB", a
version not released yet. To say that Mindcraft had help in maxing out
the NT performance is an understatement...
JLK
Linux, because it's STABLE, the source code is included, the price is
right.
--
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
