On Monday 12 June 2006 13:28, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 11:58:24AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 12 June 2006 08:53, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>
> > > I would do the rename since built-in suspend *will* confuse users (it
> > > confused
> > > me at first time even that I use linux for several years) and renaming is
> > > easier now than when suspend.sf.net stuff becomes more popular (like
> > > after
> > > 2.6.17 is released).
> >
> > I tend to agree. It may be a problem for SUSE (suspend has been shipped in
> > 10.1), but generally it's better not to confuse anyone. ;-)
>
> no, the suspend package deliberately _only_ contains s2ram, no other tools
> (yet) since the 10.1 kernel is not uswsusp-enabled anyway.
>
> > Stefan, would you agree with changing the name of "suspend" to "s2disk"?
>
> Yes, but remember that the Gnome/HAL crowd has recently decided that the whole
> world must now call suspend to ram "suspend" and suspend to disk "hibernate",
> since this is apparently the way windows does it.
>
> I won't comment on that... :-)
>
> Go ahead, rename it to s2disk.
OK, thanks.
I'd like to do the following:
1) Release the current CVS _plus_ the HOWTO patch regarding the built-in
suspend commands as suspend-0.2.
2) Start the new development cycle from renaming "suspend" to "s2disk".
Please let me know if that'd be OK.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
Now some men hustle and some just think.
And some go running before you blink.
Some look up and some look down
from three hundred feet above the ground.
Ian Anderson - "Steel Monkey"
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
