On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 11:43:21PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi,
> First patch is somewhat unrelated. While fixing this I was trying to
> get the logic of read_image(). The last part is unnecessary complex. The
> if(!error || !ret) should always be true. The only reason I can think
> of is reboot() failing. This patch just removes that `if' and adds
> some protection for a failing reboot();
This looks sane, maybe for the failed reboot a
while(1)
sleep(1);
construct would be better (i hate busy loops, even if they can never
happen :-)
--
Stefan Seyfried
QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?"
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
