Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Sun, 20 May 2007 15:27:18 +0200 > Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Rafael wrote: >> >>> Actually, on x86-64 you have to compile it with >>> $ make BACKEND=x86emu > >>> Seife, perhaps we should add this information to README? > > It is already clearly documented in the HOWTO.
Now that you point it out --- indeed it is. I must admit a violation of the RTFM rule on my part. On the other hand, I didn't expect the content of libx86/INSTALL to be found in suspend/HOWTO. >> Yes please, or add some "uname -m | grep x86_64" automatism. >> (Maybe I get bored next week and send something. Unlikely though.) > > We agreed to not have libx86 in our cvs anymore. We do not maintain it > nor develop it. With did a small poll back then; most distros had it > packaged already. It's fortunate that they are packaging it, because the upstream libx86 lacks refinement WRT packaging. (For example, libx86/INSTALL doesn't exist.) > So maybe you can package it for gentoo so other people can benefit > from it. I wish I had the time, and a machine which would resume after s2ram. (Maybe with cvs-suspend's s2ram, I'll see.) But good for me, an old APM notebook finished compiling a new kernel right now. This should suffice for my purpose. I merely wanted to react on an s2ram related bug report of a driver whose subsystem I maintain. I don't need suspend or hibernate for anything else than for working on that bug. Anyway, thanks for all the help so far. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=-= =-=-- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel