Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2007 15:27:18 +0200
> Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Rafael wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, on x86-64 you have to compile it with
>>> $ make BACKEND=x86emu
> 
>>> Seife, perhaps we should add this information to README?  
> 
> It is already clearly documented in the HOWTO.

Now that you point it out --- indeed it is.  I must admit a violation of
the RTFM rule on my part.  On the other hand, I didn't expect the
content of libx86/INSTALL to be found in suspend/HOWTO.

>> Yes please, or add some "uname -m | grep x86_64" automatism.
>> (Maybe I get bored next week and send something.  Unlikely though.)
> 
> We agreed to not have libx86 in our cvs anymore. We do not maintain it
> nor develop it. With did a small poll back then; most distros had it
> packaged already.

It's fortunate that they are packaging it, because the upstream libx86
lacks refinement WRT packaging.  (For example, libx86/INSTALL doesn't
exist.)

> So maybe you can package it for gentoo so other people can benefit
> from it.

I wish I had the time, and a machine which would resume after s2ram.
(Maybe with cvs-suspend's s2ram, I'll see.)

But good for me, an old APM notebook finished compiling a new kernel
right now.  This should suffice for my purpose.  I merely wanted to
react on an s2ram related bug report of a driver whose subsystem I
maintain.  I don't need suspend or hibernate for anything else than for
working on that bug.

Anyway, thanks for all the help so far.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=-= =-=--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel

Reply via email to