On Sat 21. Jul - 18:28:24, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 7/21/07, Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is already done in pm-utils. Upstream uses 'userspace' as governor,
> > which I personally think is wrong. openSUSE uses the 'performance'
> > governor and this only because of a bug in the kernel which caused the
> > system to hang on suspend AFAIR.
>
> You can also do the whitelist, vbetool, radeontool, pci etc...
>
> Someone needs to draw the line... :)
Right. So if we start putting things like cpufreq in the suspend package,
we would have an argumentation to put everything which is in pm-utils, the
hibernate script etc. to it. And I don't think this is what we want.
> And please remember that referencing to a specific distribution
> project/functionality is like preferring your group of users over the
> other...
Huh? That's definitely not what I wanted to communicate. It's just an
example of what the upstream pm-utils project does, which is widely
accepted btw., and what "we" do. You can do whatever you like.
Regards,
Holger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
