On Monday, 23 July 2007 22:04, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2007-07-23 20:12:21, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > On 7/23/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I guess it is easiest way for gentoo, but... I'd prefer not to switch > > >compression algorithms too often, unless there's good reason to. > > > > Support is a good reason.... :) > > Tried to talk to lzf developer, I don't want to quote the rude responses I > > got. > > > > I don't want you to switch but allow another option. > > That's even worse. I do not want to maintain two compression > algorithms :-). > > > If you ask me... I think lzo will be better for most users... But I > > If you can argue lzo is significantly better, we can switch, but we do > not want both.
I think that being supported is a good enough argument for LZO. If distributions ship it, we won't need to ask new users to build the LZF themselves (no big deal, but still). OTOH, if the user builds s2disk and resume himself, he probably won't care which compression library they are linked with anyway. Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
