On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 06:17:30PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > I suggested to provide the autoconf/automake support, but I don't wish > to work for nothing.
I for myself don't like the autofoo stuff very much and i think it is a major PITA for small projects. But i am not the one to decide this, as i am only maintaining a small piece of the code (mainly the whitelist). And as long as running "autoreconf -fi; ./configure" does not take longer than the actual compilation, i really don't care too much. I'd hate to see the tarball size going from 70kB to much over 100kB due to autoconf, though, but i cannot imagine that this might happen. -- Stefan Seyfried QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out." This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
