On Friday, 3 August 2007 00:31, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On Tuesday 31 July 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > IIRC noone was strongly against, so replacing lzf with lzo is the way > > > to go...? > > > > Ultimately, I think it is. > > Rafael, > Can you please apply the lzo support or tell me how to improve it?
OK First, please just replace LZF with LZO. If LZF is unsupported, there's no reason to drag it all the way. Second, you have added data copying in compress_compress(), which generally is not desirable. Can you avoid it? [The long term idea is to use the compression algorithm as a "replacement" for memcpy().] Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
