Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 6 August 2007 02:36, Jeff Chua wrote:
>> On 8/6/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> What does 's2ram -i' say about your machine?
>> This machine can be identified by:
>> sys_vendor = "LENOVO"
>> sys_product = "1702E7A"
>> sys_version = "ThinkPad X60s"
>> bios_version = "7BETD0WW (2.11 )"
>
> This means it's not in the whitelist, AFAICS.
>
> Similar machines are known to work with "--acpi_sleep=3" or with
> "--acpi_sleep=1 --vbe_mode".
>
I'm not all that familiar with s2ram. Any feel for why the behaviour
would have changed from the old setup code at all? Since the setup code
isn't entered on resume from STR (unlike resume from STD), as far as I
know, there can only be "some little bit of state" hanging around.
If not then perhaps we should try to get a dump of the real-mode state
area for both kernels (which would need a patch, unfortunately.)
-hpa
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
