http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/02/opinion/02krugman.html?ex
=1126324800&en=73a1bb38aa83825e&ei=5070&emc=eta1

September 2, 2005

A Can't-Do Government
By PAUL KRUGMAN

Before 9/11 the Federal Emergency Management Agency listed 
the three most likely catastrophic disasters facing America: a 
terrorist attack on New York, a major earthquake in San 
Francisco and a hurricane strike on New Orleans. "The New 
Orleans hurricane scenario," The Houston Chronicle wrote in 
December 2001, "may be the deadliest of all." It described a 
potential catastrophe very much like the one now happening.

So why were New Orleans and the nation so unprepared? After 
9/11, hard questions were deferred in the name of national unity, 
then buried under a thick coat of whitewash. This time, we need 
accountability.

First question: Why have aid and security taken so long to arrive? 
Katrina hit five days ago - and it was already clear by last Friday 
that Katrina could do immense damage along the Gulf Coast. 
Yet the response you'd expect from an advanced country never 
happened. Thousands of Americans are dead or dying, not 
because they refused to evacuate, but because they were too 
poor or too sick to get out without help - and help wasn't 
provided. Many have yet to receive any help at all.

There will and should be many questions about the response of 
state and local governments; in particular, couldn't they have 
done more to help the poor and sick escape? But the evidence 
points, above all, to a stunning lack of both preparation and 
urgency in the federal government's response. 

Even military resources in the right place weren't ordered into 
action. "On Wednesday," said an editorial in The Sun Herald in 
Biloxi, Miss., "reporters listening to horrific stories of death and 
survival at the Biloxi Junior High School shelter looked north 
across Irish Hill Road and saw Air Force personnel playing 
basketball and performing calisthenics. Playing basketball and 
performing calisthenics!"

Maybe administration officials believed that the local National 
Guard could keep order and deliver relief. But many members of 
the National Guard and much of its equipment - including 
high-water vehicles - are in Iraq. "The National Guard needs that 
equipment back home to support the homeland security 
mission," a Louisiana Guard officer told reporters several weeks 
ago.

Second question: Why wasn't more preventive action taken? After 
2003 the Army Corps of Engineers sharply slowed its 
flood-control work, including work on sinking levees. "The corps," 
an Editor and Publisher article says, citing a series of articles in 
The Times-Picayune in New Orleans, "never tried to hide the fact 
that the spending pressures of the war in Iraq, as well as 
homeland security - coming at the same time as federal tax cuts 
- was the reason for the strain."

In 2002 the corps' chief resigned, reportedly under threat of 
being fired, after he criticized the administration's proposed cuts 
in the corps' budget, including flood-control spending.

Third question: Did the Bush administration destroy FEMA's 
effectiveness? The administration has, by all accounts, treated 
the emergency management agency like an unwanted stepchild, 
leading to a mass exodus of experienced professionals.

Last year James Lee Witt, who won bipartisan praise for his 
leadership of the agency during the Clinton years, said at a 
Congressional hearing: "I am extremely concerned that the 
ability of our nation to prepare for and respond to disasters has 
been sharply eroded. I hear from emergency managers, local 
and state leaders, and first responders nearly every day that the 
FEMA they knew and worked well with has now disappeared."

I don't think this is a simple tale of incompetence. The reason 
the military wasn't rushed in to help along the Gulf Coast is, I 
believe, the same reason nothing was done to stop looting after 
the fall of Baghdad. Flood control was neglected for the same 
reason our troops in Iraq didn't get adequate armor. 

At a fundamental level, I'd argue, our current leaders just aren't 
serious about some of the essential functions of government. 
They like waging war, but they don't like providing security, 
rescuing those in need or spending on preventive measures. 
And they never, ever ask for shared sacrifice.

Yesterday Mr. Bush made an utterly fantastic claim: that nobody 
expected the breach of the levees. In fact, there had been 
repeated warnings about exactly that risk.

So America, once famous for its can-do attitude, now has a 
can't-do government that makes excuses instead of doing its 
job. And while it makes those excuses, Americans are dying. 

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to