Margaret McCasland wrote:
| FYI, if you're too young too remember, a rewording of: "What's
| good for GM is good for America," an iconic misquote.

And if you're really ancient, you'll remember Al Capp's
ultracapitalist billionaire General Bullmoose, whose motto was
"What's good for General Bullmoose is good for the USA" -- a
pretty fair representation of the moral position taken by a number
of our current CEOs, within the auto industry and without.

Katie Quinn-Jacobs wrote:
| Sure, it's becoming easier for people to appreciate the pitfalls
| of growth capitalism, but is there any other viable option ready
| to step in?  I see the lack of economic savvy as the weak link in
| the sustainability revolution.  How do we organize markets without
| growth?  Is there an economic arm to this movement?

I agree that the sustainability movement is in general sadly
lacking in economic savvy, but the question assumes that we're in
a position to have any influence on the direction the country
takes.  Tony Del Plato's question "Will we continue to allow 'free
market' energy development, especially petroleum?" makes what
seems to me to be the same assumption.  In fact, "we" are not
going to have squat to say about this.

I'm more hopeful than I was three years ago that we can have some
influence on public policy at the town level and maybe (if we try
real hard) at the county level, but beyond that, I think that
economic developments at the state and national level will be
driven by market forces largely beyond anyone's control; I suspect
they're just something we'll have to cope with.  I'd rather see us
concentrate on local initiatives that might do some good (like
AFCU) than waste our energy thinking about how to influence the
larger picture.

Unless something unexpected happens, it's likely that the
unemployment tsunami headed our way is going to force the
institution of huge new-new-deal programs that will shape our
economic strategy for years to come.  Obama is already indicating
this.  If that's the case, efforts to shape policy at the national
and state level would probably best be devoted to getting those
programs heading in the right direction (toward rebuilding
passenger rail instead of expanding the highway infrastructure,
for example) rather than trying to replace capitalism with
something more sensible.

If history is any guide, we'll be lucky if the anger of the
American public over their shattered dreams heads in the direction
of welfare socialism rather than fascism.  If we're going to have
any influence on this, it will probably be through example.

Jon


_______________________________________________
For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County area, please 
visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/ 

RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
[email protected]
http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org

Reply via email to