This article makes a nice sidebar to Tom Shelley's TCLocal piece on
waste treatment last month.

Jon

==================================================================

The New York Times
Op-Ed Contributor
Yellow Is the New Green
By ROSE GEORGE

Woolley, England

IN the far reaches of Shaanxi Province in northern China, in an
apple-producing village named Ganquanfang, I recently visited a
house belonging to two cheery primary-school teachers, Zhang Min
Shu and his wife, Wu Zhaoxian. Their house wasn’t exceptional -- a
spacious yard, several rooms -- except for the bathroom. There, up
a few steps on a tiled platform, sat a toilet unlike any I’d
seen. Its pan was divided in two: solid waste went in the back,
and the front compartment collected urine. The liquids and solids
can, after a decent period of storage and composting, be applied
to the fields as pathogen-free, expense-free fertilizer.

 From being unsure of wanting a toilet near the house in the first
place -- which is why the bathroom is at the far end of their
courtyard -- the couple had become so delighted with it that they
regretted not putting it next to the kitchen after all.

What does this have to do with you? Mr. Zhang and Ms. Wu’s weird
toilet -- known as a "urine diversion," or NoMix (after a Swedish
brand), toilet -- may have things to teach us all.

In the industrialized world, most of us (except those who have
septic tanks) rely on wastewater-treatment plants to remove our
excrement from the drinking-water supply, in great
volumes. (Toilets can use up to 30 percent of a household’s water
supply.) This paradigm is rarely questioned, and I understand why:
flush toilets, sewers and wastewater-treatment plants do a fine
job of separating us from our potentially toxic waste, and
eliminating cholera and other waterborne diseases. Without them,
cities wouldn’t work.

But the paradigm is flawed. For a start, cleaning sewage guzzles
energy. Sewage treatment in Britain uses a quarter of the energy
generated by the country’s largest coal-fired power station.

Then there is the nutrient problem: Human excrement is rich in
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, which is why it has been a
good fertilizer for millenniums and until surprisingly
recently. (A 19th-century "sewage farm" in Pasadena, Calif., was
renowned for its tasty walnuts.) But when sewage is dumped in the
seas in great quantity, these nutrients can unbalance and
sometimes suffocate life, contributing to dead zones (405
worldwide and counting, according to a recent study). Sewage,
according to the United Nations Environment Program, is the
biggest marine pollutant there is. Wastewater-treatment plants
work to extract the nutrients before discharging sewage into water
courses, but they can’t remove them all.

And there’s also the urine problem. Urine, like any liquid, is a
headache for wastewater managers, because most sewer systems take
water from street drains along with the toilet, shower and kitchen
kind. Population growth is already taxing sewers. (London’s great
network was built in the late 19th century with 25 percent extra
capacity, but a system designed for three million people must now
serve more than twice as many.) When a rainstorm suddenly sends
millions of gallons of water into an already overloaded system,
the extra must be stored or -- if storage is lacking --
discharged, untreated, into the nearest river or harbor. Each
week, New York City sends about 800 Olympic-size swimming pools’
worth of sewage-polluted water into nearby waters because there’s
nowhere else for it to go.

This probably won’t kill us, but it’s not ideal. Environmental
scientists in California have calculated that sewage discharged
near 28 Southern California beaches has contributed to up to 1.5
million excess gastrointestinal illnesses, costing as much as $51
million in health care. We can do better.

Urine might be one way forward. Before engineers scoff into their
breakfast, consider that since at least 135,000 urine-diversion
toilets are in use in Sweden and that a Swiss aquatic institute
did a six-year study of urine separation that found in its
favor. In Sweden, some of the collected urine -- which contains 80
percent of the nutrients in excrement -- is given to farmers, with
little objection. "If they can use urine and it’s cheap, they’ll
use it," said Petter Jenssen, a professor at the Agricultural
University of Norway.

The price of phosphorus fertilizers rose 50 percent in the past
year in some parts of the world, as phosphate reserves, the
largest of which are in Morocco and China, dwindle. (The gloomiest
predictions suggest they’ll be gone in 100 years.) Although half
of sewage sludge in the United States is already turned into cheap
fertilizer known as "biosolids," urine contains hardly any of the
pathogens or heavy metals that critics of biosolids claim remain
in mixed sewage, despite treatment.

The rest of Sweden’s collected urine goes to municipal wastewater
plants, but in much smaller volume so it’s easier to deal
with. Research by Jac Wilsenach, now a civil engineer in South
Africa, found that removing even half of the nutrient-rich urine
enables the bacteria in the aeration tanks to munch all the
nitrogen and phosphate matter in solid waste in a single day
rather than the usual 30. Urine diversion also makes for richer
sludge and produces more methane, which can be turned into gas or
electricity, Mr. Wilsenach said. In short, separating urine turns
a guzzler of energy into a net producer.

Putting urine to use is not new. A friend’s grandmother remembers
the man coming round for the buckets 60 years ago in Yorkshire,
which were then sold to the tanning industry. The flush toilet
ended that, and no one -- my friend’s nan included -- wants
outside privies again. "Any innovation in the toilet that
increases owner responsibility is probably seen as downwardly
mobile," said Carol Steinfeld, of New Bedford, Mass., who imports
NoMix toilets into the United States.

Then there’s the sitting problem: in most urine-diversion toilets,
a man must empty his bladder sitting down. This wouldn’t be a
problem in some countries -- Germany recently introduced a
toilet-seat alarm that admonishes standers to sit -- but it has
been in others. Professor Jenssen was flummoxed by one participant
at a training workshop in Cuba who said firmly, "If a man sits, he
is homosexual."

For now, "ecological sanitation" -- or more sustainable sewage
disposal -- thrives mostly in fast-industrializing countries like
China and India, which have money to invest in alternatives but
few sewers. A subculture of composting toilets exists in the
United States, but only a few hundred urine-diversion toilets have
been imported, Ms. Steinfeld said.

Necessity -- whether occasioned by fertilizer prices, carbon
footprints or crippling capital investments -- could bring
change. At a recent wastewater conference, I watched in
astonishment as dour engineers rushed to question a speaker who
had been talking about stabilization ponds, which clean sewage
using water, flow control, bacteria and light. Normally, such
things would be cast into the box of hippie-ish ecological
sanitation. But to managers struggling with energy quotas and
budget limitations, more sustainable, less energy-intensive
sanitation may be starting to make sense.

As Mr. Zhang told me with a smile: "For me, whatever the toilet
is, I use it. For example, here we eat wheat. When we go to the
south of China, we eat rice. Otherwise we starve."

It’s been more than 100 years since Teddy Roosevelt wondered aloud
whether "civilized people ought to know how to dispose of the
sewage in some other way than putting it into the drinking water."
The Zhang family toilet is not the perfect answer to Roosevelt, as
it still uses some water, though 80 percent less than a regular
flush toilet uses. But at least it’s the result of someone asking
the right questions.

==

Rose George is the author of "The Big Necessity: The Unmentionable
World of Human Waste and Why It Matters."



_______________________________________________
For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County area, please 
visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/ 

RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
[email protected]
http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
Questions about the list? ask [email protected]
free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org

Reply via email to