Ronan Oger wrote: > On Thursday 04 November 2004 16.24, Robin Berjon wrote: >>Ronan: I don't see what you find wrong with SVGTimer, it's just a >>standardisation of ad hoc methods that already exist, minus their flaws >>and plus coherent design -- nothing special, and almost no extra work >>for implementers. > > I find nothing *wrong* with SVGTinmer. I simply question whether this can be > done fast enough alerady, and whether it is necessary to add into the > specification requirements that are already met outside. Sometimes I wonder > if people ask for particular requirements because they/we are too lazy to > find a way with the existing tools.
Well I think the WG isn't generally lazy in "finding a way with existing tools". What's already there simply doesn't work. -- Robin Berjon ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> $9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything. http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/1U_rlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ---- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
