Philippe Lhoste:
> After some experimentation, it seems that ASV needs a missing-glyph
> element inside the font one.
> After I added one, it works fine, but of course (?), the glyphs E, L and
> O are rendered with the missing-glyph, not with the sans-serif font.
Thanks Philippe, this fixed the problem!
> I don't know the spec. enough to say if this is the required behavior or
> not.
Certainly I don't think a missing-glyph element is required. The choice
of glyph when a missing-glyph element is present and there is a fallback
font to choose from I'm not too sure about. For example with:
<font>
<font-face font-family="test"/>
<missing-glyph d="..."/>
</font>
<text font-family="test, serif">hi</text>
my guess is that the 'h' and 'i' should be rendered with serif's glyphs,
rather than with test's missing-glyph. At least, that is what Batik
does. And it seems sensible. But in ASV it will use the missing-glyph.
Cameron
--
e-mail : cam (at) mcc.id.au icq : 26955922
web : http://mcc.id.au/ msn : cam-msn (at) aka.mcc.id.au
office : +61399055779 jabber : heycam (at) jabber.org
-----
To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-or-
visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my
membership"
----
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
