welkerpaul wrote: > Aye, looks like svg is an excellent niche for blockheaded idealists? > Since Rick did call for a *well executed*, *positively spun* > campaign, he's reasonably up in the air.. > A penny for Omar's thoughts. >
per Paypal?? Hi, all i say is that i don't want to have to check on the browser version and type AGAIN! Remember when you had to watch out, if the browser the client was using was ie 4 or netscape (with all the different versions) or perhaps opera so that you THEN knew how to do things right? If ms really did it right, then yeah, no prob on my side, but because i simply don't believe they will ... cya. Omar > Beyond it, let's hope for an avalon based svg implementation in ie8? > --- In [email protected], "Rick Bullotta" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>By halfway I mean SVG Tiny 1.1, per the spec. The "half" part is > > not implementing SVG Basic or full. > >>________________________________ >> >>From: [email protected] on behalf of Omar Abo-Namous >>Sent: Sun 7/24/2005 9:37 AM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: [svg-developers] Native SVG Support in IE8 >> >> >> >>Hello, >> >>if implementing svg natively in ie means the same as the > > implementation > >>of other w3c-recommendations, then i am certainly against it. If we >>think about the differences in implementing a recommendation as > > trivial > >>and yet vital as html or xhtml, then i am clearly against the >>implementation (halfway). It would be still better to use the adobe >>svg-viewer, which at least tries to implement the svg-rec. to a > > great > >>extent.. >> >>Omar >> >>Rick Bullotta wrote: >> >>>OK, we all know this isn't in the plans...but maybe, just MAYBE - > > a well executed, POSITIVELY SPUN, e-mail and press/media campaign > upped the pressure on MS to support SVG Tiny 1.1 (the code is 90% > done - just retool VML!), with pressure from users, corporate > customers, ISV's, media pundits, the mobile providers and equipment > vendors, I think it could happen. > >>>Who wants to lead the charge? >>> >>>If there's any resistance to doing this in the SVG community, > > that would speak volumes about the prospects of SVG going big-time > mainstream. Like it or not, having MS on board partway is better > than not at all. > >>>Even cooler would be for the SVG community to donate the > > implementation code to MS's development organization - we all know > how $$$'s are tight there ;). > >>>In any case, whadda ya all think? >>> >>>- Rick >>> >>> >>> >>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>> >>> >>> >>>----- >>>To unsubscribe send a message to: svg-developers- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>-or- >>>visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and > > click "edit my membership" > >>>---- >>>Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>----- >>To unsubscribe send a message to: svg-developers- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>-or- >>visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit > > my membership" > >>---- >>Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > ----- > To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -or- > visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my > membership" > ---- > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ---- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
