I'll tell you what's going happen:

There will be a workaround to get an SVG document automatically 
focused in an EMBED. Many will do the same on other apps with 
elegance and style.
Let Enolas come after every raggedy-assed developer. After all, the 
big guys with the deep pockets will have complied.

I'm happy, again :)
Francis

--- In [email protected], "Geoffrey Swenson" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't think Microsoft, Adobe, or anyone else other than Eolas 
are happy
> about this, and Eolas would be a lot happier if M$ would just pay 
them their
> hefty ransom. There is no conspiracy against the Embed tag needed 
to explain
> their actions.
> 
>  
> 
> M$ is going to get a lot of flak for this, but they just don't 
want to
> encourage Eolas at all who have been legally contentious and 
extremely
> greedy from day one on a rather bogus patent of the technically 
obvious with
> plenty of prior art that invalidates it. Basically, none of the big
> companies in software, and even the many of the open source 
people, want
> Eolas to win on this one, since Eolas will be trying to extract 
revenue from
> Mozilla, Opera, and others after they get done with M$.
> 
>  
> 
> What you should be doing is petitioning congress to end software 
patents.
> They have caused way too many problems, don't really protect 
intellectual
> property at all, and have been mostly abused.
> 
>  
> 
> Geoffrey J. Swenson
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:svg-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Francis Hemsher
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 5:27 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [svg-developers] Re: IE7 Beta 2 has an SVG Embed Problem
> 
>  
> 
> John Dowdell wrote:
> >
> > Francis Hemsher wrote:
> > > I think you left out the most germane part of my statement...
> > > "This was not a problem in IE5.5, IE6, or your previous IE7 
Beta 
> > > issue"
> > 
> > Yes, Microsoft just introduced this change on March 1, for IE6 
> > installations and the new IE7 beta... contemporaneous reporting 
> here:
> > 
> 
http://weblogs.macromedia.com/jd/archives/2006/03/ie_activex_chan.cfm
> > 
> > The behavior of extensions in that browser did indeed change 
only 
> very 
> > recently.
> > 
> > jd
> >
> 
> I read your above comments.  They don't go far enough to call MS 
on 
> an obvious attempt to use a current legal situation to depreciate 
> the EMBED, for self-serving reasons. Their "click me" approach has 
> destroyed the intuitive process required to view dynamic SVG 
> documents.
> 
> Francis
> 
> Francis
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> To unsubscribe send a message to: svg-developers-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -or-
> visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit 
my
> membership"
> ---- 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
> 
>  
> 
> *      Visit your group "svg-developers
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers> " on the web.
>   
> *      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
subject=Unsubscribe> 
>   
> *      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Service. 
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






-----
To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-or-
visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my 
membership"
---- 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to