> > With the embed vs object question that continues to surface, why isn't > > inlining ever proposed? > > Larry > > > > I think because inline SVG in IE requires HTML while inline SVG in > Firefox/Opera/WebKit requires XHTML. Plus, all of your SVG must be > prefixed, which makes markup more frustrating to write. > -Jason Davis
In my case I am rendering graphical views of data objects. All I need in the page is a SVG document. From my earlier post, once I have this object, I can create the rest of the SVG objects via normal DOM calls. So basically the following is all I need which should work in IE (after I add the Adobe object and namespace import statement) and Firefox 1.5 right? Since the page is a servlet/JSP, setting the proper content type is easily managed as well. <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";> <svg:svg id='display' width='400' height='300'> </svg:svg> </html> This lets it become a first class player on the page which has tremendous benefits IMO. Larry ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ---- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
