--- In [email protected], "ddailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> So I followed up with a bit of reading on Silverlight in Wikipedia[2]. In Wikipedia's collective evolution toward making arguments "balanced," I noticed a) that the first reference to SVG in that article appears, to my thinking, just a little bit late for something which is, in fact, so directly derived from an open standard [3] and b) that when SVG is finally mentioned (rather near the end of the article), one person is cited as denouncing Microsoft's "ignoring of open standards" Another person is cited with a rather interesting contrasting argument I had never heard before. > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > If you have spare couple of weeks, the painful evolution of the article's position on Silverlight v SVG can be experienced at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Microsoft_Silverlight/archivelist/Archive_1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Microsoft_Silverlight/archivelist/Archive_2 Of course, anyone can ignore all that and 'be bold'. ------------------------------------ ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ----Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
