I think the functionality proposed by the replicate element is definitely of interest even if it is only used by animators to visualise their animations ;-)
David has pointed out already that everybody other than Microsoft has already implemented all the required functionality. As the WG is proposing to add a viewing transformation to SVG, my query is whether there is a need for a new replicate element? If you assume SVG drawings currently exist in a 3D space of x,y and t and the WG is proposing to add a fourth (z) plus a transformation on to a 2D space then, as long as the transformation allows parallel projections along the t-axis, don't we get all we need from animate and calcMode="discrete"? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [email protected] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ----Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
