2008/11/27 M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Is C99 construct here intentional? If so, when did we agree on using > : only C99 compilers on our code base? > > I'm not sure about *THIS* c99 construct, but we've been heavily > relying on the field name initializer stuff for a couple of years now. And at least the newer GEOM code also uses c99 variable declarations (not only for initializers - they were c99 from the start). _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
