"Garrett Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] I honestly think that the tinderbox target should be renamed to > tinderfarm [...]
Bikeshed. There is already a 'universe' target that does everything Alfred wants except exit 1 on error. At least one working patch was put forward (by bz@) to make it do that, and phk@ agreed that it was a sensible thing to do. There is no need for a new target, and if there were, calling it tinderwhatever would be misleading at best. > [...] I do think that keeping a tinderfarm build target within the > make system would be beneficial though, as it would allow the > tinderbox Perl script to shrink [...] No, it wouldn't. > 3. As for the issue with make universe, isn't there an equivalent to > :: in pmake like there is in gmake? Targets can fail to build, but at > least it'll continue moving on, and if the output messages are proper, > one can note: `blah target failed' *shrugs*, and keep on moving on. This is a non-issue; "continue moving on" is how 'make universe' has always worked, and I added 'blah target failed' a week ago. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
