On Sun, Apr 12, 2009, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:07:02 +0400 > Stanislav Sedov <s...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > Log: > > > GNU Pth has some fragile kludges that were broken by r189828. > > > I've discussed this with the Pth maintainer and no clear solution > > > has emerged on the ports side of things, so for now, hack around > > > the issue in signal.h. > > Can't we just put a patch in ports tree itself? What meant under 'no > > clean solution emerged'? I can prepare a patch, if needed. > > I think so, too. I have a quick hack patch.
As I mentioned to vd@ on 3/20, I'd prefer something like that. Does your proposed patch also work for the ports that depend on GNU Pth, some of which may depend on signal.h? _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
