On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 16:51 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:51:44AM +0000, Xin LI wrote: > > Attempt to connect to alternate addresses if the connect doesn't > > succeed in 180ms, and cut wait time between connection attempts > > in half for each additional, if no connection was established. > > 180ms is very short. I have such latency over 2G, 3G and 4G most of the > time, soo wouldn't this make whois pretty much useless on such > connections?
Google Chromium/Chrome uses a 300ms timeout when falling back from IPv6 to IPv4. Maybe the 180ms timeout should be increased to match? Thanks, Shawn
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
