On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 01:58:15PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:42:11PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 01:30:27PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 08:08:26PM +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > Author: bapt > > > > Date: Fri May 1 20:08:25 2015 > > > > New Revision: 282318 > > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/282318 > > > > > > > > Log: > > > > Replace groff's soelim by soeliminate(1) renamed soelim(1) > > > > > > > > > > Given that soeliminate(1) does not implement 4 of the 5 > > > options available to soelim, how are these utilities at > > > all compatiablity? > > > > > > src/UPDATING? > > > > I have not been able to find a single usage of soelim(1) that uses any of > > the > > other options than the one I did implement in soeliminate otherwise I would > > have > > implemented them. > > Your presuming that no user uses one or more of these options > in their own projects. > > > UPDATING is not for when a user operation is needed while updating? here it > > should be transparent and I will implement all the missing bits if > > incompatibilities are really found. > > UPDATING is for warning users that a gratuitious incompatible > change has been introduced into the functionality once offered > by the base system. > > 20150501: > soelim(1) from gnu/usr.bin/groff has been replaced by > usr.bin/soeliminate, which has reduced functionality. If you > need a functional soelim(1), then install textproc/groff.
soelim(1) has multiple implementations, the version from groff is just "special" by adding plenty of options, all other implementation out there have 0 options incluing the original soelim(1) Best regards, Bapt
pgpCIpZmbwkek.pgp
Description: PGP signature
