On 15/06/2015 21:06, Warner Losh wrote: > >> On Jun 15, 2015, at 8:37 AM, Matthew Ahrens <m...@mahrens.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> P.S. My personal preference would be to drop that compat code and to >> convince ZFS/FreeBSD users to always use boot environments, so that their >> kernel and userland never fall out of sync :) >> >> Me too :-) > > Sadly, there are a number of upgrade scenarios where this simply isn’t > possible.
Curious what are those... The only scenario I can think of is one where there is not enough space to hold the previous OS bits and the new ones. But in such a constrained system there is probably not much use for ZFS anyway. > But looking at the file, it appears to be full of stuff to do the 8.x -> > 9.x upgrade of ZFS to format 28. Perhaps that can now be removed? I would expect that every user of ZFS/FreeBSD has moved past that line by now, but who knows... > These libraries appear to be versioned, rather than symbol versioned > otherwise Baptiste’s commit would have been bad… but I wonder if maybe a > version bump is in order… I think we should be okay without a version bump, because the symbol is moved from a library to its dependency. So, libzfs_core interface is extended and that should not be a problem for its users. And libzfs users should not notice that the symbol migrated from libzfs to libfzs_core because the users have to link to both libraries (or load both of them). -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
