On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:20:46PM +0000, Warner Losh wrote: > > Author: imp > > Date: Tue Jan 5 21:20:46 2016 > > New Revision: 293226 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/293226 > > > > Log: > > Disable abi variant hook until strangeness with packages can be sorted > > out. > > > > Modified: > > head/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c > > > > Modified: head/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c > > > ============================================================================== > > --- head/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c Tue Jan 5 21:12:49 2016 > (r293225) > > +++ head/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c Tue Jan 5 21:20:46 2016 > (r293226) > > @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ _rtld(Elf_Addr *sp, func_ptr_type *exit_ > > > > trust = !issetugid(); > > > > - md_abi_variant_hook(aux_info); > > +/* md_abi_variant_hook(aux_info); */ > > > > ld_bind_now = getenv(_LD("BIND_NOW")); > > /* > The ARM hook resets the default paths to the libsoft variants. It cannot > work while /lib, /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib are populated with soft-fp > libraries. I thought that you are going to switch the default target_arch > to armv6hf immediately after the commit to rtld. > That analysis isn't quite right. I'll throw the replacement switch very soon. The problem is that it highlighted was things were incomplete, not that I'd left soft float libraries where I did for a short period of time. > And then, looking into the issue, IMO the way forward is to leave softfp > libraries where they are, but install v6hf somewhere in /lib/armv6hf etc. > No. That's even worse. We're not doing that. Warner _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
