Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 13 00:22:12 2016
New Revision: 293792
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/293792
Log:
Go back to using uintptr_t, because code that actually compiles is
infinitely less buggy than code that is theoretically correct in some
alternate universe.
The uintfptr_t type is apparently a freebsd invention, and exists only when
compiling the kernel. It's a little hard to say for sure, since it doesn't
seem to be documented anywhere except in email advice to unsuspecting and
overly-trusting souls, who then get to wear the pointy hat for blindly
following advice without investigating or testing it first.
Modified:
head/sys/boot/uboot/lib/copy.c
Modified: head/sys/boot/uboot/lib/copy.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/boot/uboot/lib/copy.c Tue Jan 12 23:48:39 2016
(r293791)
+++ head/sys/boot/uboot/lib/copy.c Wed Jan 13 00:22:12 2016
(r293792)
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ uboot_loadaddr(u_int type, void *data, u
biggest_block = 0;
biggest_size = 0;
- subldr = rounddown2((uintfptr_t)_start, KERN_ALIGN);
+ subldr = rounddown2((uintptr_t)_start, KERN_ALIGN);
eubldr = roundup2((uint64_t)uboot_heap_end, KERN_ALIGN);
for (i = 0; i < si->mr_no; i++) {
if (si->mr[i].flags != MR_ATTR_DRAM)
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
