On 29.05.2016 22:39, Conrad Meyer wrote: > Does clang actually generate different code with this change?
Yes, without -O it generates andl $2147483647, ... With -O nothing is changed. In general, it can be not clang and I see no point to left junk code in any case. > > On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Andrey A. Chernov <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Author: ache >> Date: Sun May 29 16:39:28 2016 >> New Revision: 300965 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/300965 >> >> Log: >> Micro optimize: C standard guarantees that right shift for unsigned value >> fills left bits with zero, and we have exact 32bit unsigned value >> (uint32_t), so there is no reason to add "& 0x7fffffff" here. >> >> MFC after: 1 week >> >> Modified: >> head/lib/libc/stdlib/random.c >> >> Modified: head/lib/libc/stdlib/random.c >> ============================================================================== >> --- head/lib/libc/stdlib/random.c Sun May 29 16:32:56 2016 >> (r300964) >> +++ head/lib/libc/stdlib/random.c Sun May 29 16:39:28 2016 >> (r300965) >> @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ random(void) >> */ >> f = fptr; r = rptr; >> *f += *r; >> - i = (*f >> 1) & 0x7fffffff; /* chucking least random bit >> */ >> + i = *f >> 1; /* chucking least random bit */ >> if (++f >= end_ptr) { >> f = state; >> ++r; >> > _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"