On Aug 16, 2009, at 2:41 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/8/16 Marcel Moolenaar <xcl...@mac.com>:
On Aug 15, 2009, at 7:19 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/8/16 Marcel Moolenaar <mar...@freebsd.org>:
Author: marcel
Date: Sun Aug 16 02:12:13 2009
New Revision: 196270
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/196270
Log:
MFC rev 196268:
Decouple ACPI CPU Ids from FreeBSD's cpuid. The ACPI Ids can be
sparse, which causes a kernel assert.
Can you be a bit more precise?
What kernel assert?
In subr_smp.c, function smp_topo():
panic("Built bad topology at %p. CPU mask 0x%X != 0x%X",
top, top->cg_mask, all_cpus);
See also:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=506001+0+archive/2009/freebsd-current/20090719.freebsd-current
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=626164+0+archive/2009/freebsd-current/20090719.freebsd-current
lThat's very interesting. That probabilly means we will end without
any sparse CPUs IDs on all architectures?
Yes. It also means that hot-swap CPUs are impossible to
support for reasons that are unrelated to the technical
problems of managing the appearance and disappearance
of CPUs.
--
Marcel Moolenaar
xcl...@mac.com
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
