Bezüglich Glen Barber's Nachricht vom 21.09.2016 16:19 (localtime):
> Author: gjb
> Date: Wed Sep 21 14:19:01 2016
> New Revision: 306103
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/306103
> Document r291292, if_enc(4) addition.
> Submitted by: ae
> Approved by: re (implicit)
> Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
> Modified: releng/11.0/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/article.xml
> --- releng/11.0/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/article.xml Wed Sep
> 21 14:15:15 2016 (r306102)
> +++ releng/11.0/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/article.xml Wed Sep
> 21 14:19:01 2016 (r306103)
> @@ -1433,6 +1433,12 @@
> arch="arm64">Initial <acronym>SMP</acronym> support has been
> added to the &os;/&arch.arm64; port.</para>
> + <para revision="291292" contrib="sponsor" sponsor="&yandex;">The
> + &man.enc.4; driver has been added, providing an interface
> + through which <acronym>IPSEC</acronym> can be used via
> + &man.kldload.8; without requiring additional kernel and/or
> + userland changes.</para>
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but if_enc(4) has been present at least
In my opinion (non-native english speaker), the paragraph is misleading.
if_enc(4) cannot be »used« for IPSec, but proviedes access to
decapsulated ESP traffic processd in kernel space.
I would understand this paragraph as if I could construct any kind of
VPN(IPSec)-tunnel with if_enc(4).
Mybe it's just me, please jump in experts!
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"