On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:19:24 +0100, Mathieu Arnold <m...@freebsd.org> wrote:
Le 21/03/2017 à 08:27, Gleb Smirnoff a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 08:22:19AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
B> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:54:33PM -0700, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
B> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 07:50:32AM +0100, Antoine Brodin wrote:
B> > A> > This change is known to break a ton of ports. More than 100
if
B> > A> > counting depends. I'm sorry for that and I already started to
fix
B> > A> > them.
B> > A> >
B> > A> > Please send all new breakages to me.
B> > A>
B> > A> Hi,
B> > A>
B> > A> Exp-runs should happen before breakage happens, not after.
B> > A> If you already know that it breaks hundreds of ports, please
revert
B> > A> and request an exp-run.
B> >
B> > The exp-run has already been made:
B> >
B> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210673
B> >
B> > Wasn't very helpful.
B> >
B>
B> I disagree it was useful it showed you some ports that were breaking
given there
B> was some high level one you were expected to provide patches to fix
them.
I'm working on them right now.
You should have worked on it *before* the patch breaking everything
landed, providing patches for the ports that were reported as broken,
and repeat until all the ports that were building before were building
again.
You should **not** have committed the patch to the src tree before all
those patches were created, and you should have committed all the
patches at once, preferably before committing the patch to the src tree.
People should...
No ports are broken on released version of FreeBSD. The broken ones are
being fixed.
And a very good improvement of code has happened. Maybe a notice in
UPDATING helps third-party people.
I don't see a real problem. Only progress.
Ronald.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
