Hi Hiren, > I know this is not a new topic but a little more descriptive commit-log would > have been nicer. Also, you should update the manpage reflecting this change. > i.e. now it also supports software LRO when h/w LRO is disabled. Will do. Sorry about that.
> Do you know of a case where one would want to disable h/w lro and enable s/w > lro? I guess where you want to free up nic and make cpu do more work? I was under the impression as well, that s/w lro is moot, if h/w lro was available, till one costumer asked for it. Not sure what the use case is. Thanks David S. -----Original Message----- From: hiren panchasara [mailto:hi...@strugglingcoder.info] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 4:02 PM To: David C Somayajulu <davi...@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committ...@freebsd.org; svn-src-all@freebsd.org; svn-src-h...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r316309 - head/sys/dev/qlxgbe On 03/30/17 at 10:43P, David C Somayajulu wrote: > Author: davidcs > Date: Thu Mar 30 22:43:32 2017 > New Revision: 316309 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/316309 > > Log: > Add support for optional Soft LRO Hi David, I know this is not a new topic but a little more descriptive commit-log would have been nicer. Also, you should update the manpage reflecting this change. i.e. now it also supports software LRO when h/w LRO is disabled. Do you know of a case where one would want to disable h/w lro and enable s/w lro? I guess where you want to free up nic and make cpu do more work? Cheers, Hiren _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
