On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:43:30AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday, May 19, 2017 06:33:55 PM Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:17:23AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Thursday, May 18, 2017 11:24:29 PM Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > I think an upgrade won't bring the file back necessarily (etcupdate warns > > > you > > > that a removed file changed, but it doesn't bring it back, I think a > > > similar > > > strategy might be sensible for pkg as well). > > > > I need to check, I do not remember what I did here and I will certainly add > > a > > regression test for that to ensure this behaviour is always working as > > expected. > > One nice "feature" to have in pkg for pkgbase would be a way to ask pkg to > restore > a stock configuration file (perhaps with an option to restore it to an > alternate > directory or filename?) This would imply that packages would need to keep the > "pristine" conf files around somewhere. This would also let you do 'pkg > confdiff' > or the like (as a replacement for 'etcupdate diff')
Yes this is in my TODO list Bapt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
