Hello Robert, * Robert Watson <rwat...@freebsd.org> wrote: > Is there some relationship between the various changesets merged > together here? One nice thing about grouping merged changesets in > some way is that it makes backing them out more sensible if there's > a problem (since you just revert the whole changeset, etc).
Well, it initially happened like this, because I wanted to merge back multiple changes back to releng/8 with re@'s approval. re@ required diff files to include commit messages and proper mergeinfo. Because I can't think of a way to prepare a larger set of patches that include proper mergeinfo without constantly reverting back and forth or keeping track of multiple 1.2 GB checkouts, I eventually just decided to create a bigger patch, so it was more an exception than a routine. Reverting patches shouldn't be a problem, because I could always just svn merge -c -123456 to revert individual commits. -- Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpUrhb0zOpEl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
