> On 15 April 2018 at 17:53, Kyle Evans <kev...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Rodney W. Grimes
> > <free...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 20:17 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >>> > -- Start of PGP signed section.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 02:51:04AM +0000, Eitan Adler wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Author: eadler
> >>> > > > Date: Thu Mar 29 02:50:57 2018
> >>> > > > New Revision: 331722
> >>> > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/331722
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Log:
> >>> > > > ? Revert r330897:
> >>> > > > ??
> >>> > > > ? This was intended to be a non-functional change. It wasn't. The 
> >>> > > > commit
> >>> > > > ? message was thus wrong. In addition it broke arm, and merged 
> >>> > > > crypto
> >>> > > > ? related code.
> >>> > > > ??
> >>> > > > ? Revert with prejudice.
> >>> > > > ??
> >>> > > > ? This revert skips files touched in r316370 since that commit was 
> >>> > > > since
> >>> > > > ? MFCed.
> >>> > Um, not sure that was the right way to revert :-(.
> >>> >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > ? This revert also skips files that require $FreeBSD$ property
> >>> > > > ? changes.
> >>> > And more doubts that this is right to skip anything.
> >>> >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > ? Thank you to those who helped me get out of this mess including 
> >>> > > > but not
> >>> > > > ? limited to gonzo, kevans, rgrimes.
> >>> > > > ??
> >>> > > > ? Requested by: gjb (re)
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > I did *not* request this, especially not on re@'s behalf.??I provided
> >>> > > input on what I felt was the correct way to proceed in this situation,
> >>> > > where a number of commits that were not related to the intent were
> >>> > > included.??There is a difference.
> >>> > I tried to get this slowed down until we could get to a concenses,
> >>> > I think our mess is as big now as it was before.
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> Or bigger. I've just discovered this commit reverted stuff that wasn't
> >>> part of the bad original MFC commit. Things I MFC'd to 11 before this
> >>> revert are now missing changes and the symptoms don't show up until a
> >>> module fails to load due to missing symbols.
> >>>
> >>> I guess every change on the stable-11 branch between r330897 and
> >>> r331722 needs to be audited to see if MFC'd or changed code has been
> >>> unintentionally reverted.
> >>>
> >>> Here's the example I've just run across...
> >>>
> >>> r330897 merged this:
> >>>
> >>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/11/sys/dev/spibus/ofw_spibus.c?r1=302408&r2=330897
> >>>
> >>> Then I did some MFCing, then r331722 "reverted" this:
> >>>
> >>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/11/sys/dev/spibus/ofw_spibus.c?r1=331506&r2=331722
> >>
> >> *sigh*  Ok, I can at least do an audit of the r331722
> >> that was suppose to be a revert and see what else I find.
> >>
> >> I'll start on this tomarrow and get the first pass audit out fairly early
> >> in the morning my time (PST)
> >>
> >> Do we revert the attempted revert, then properly revert the original?
> 
> I am beyond confused. How did
> svn merge -c-r330897 .
> fail?

What was the state of .?

> 
> At this point I am scared of touching subversion as I have no idea how
> what I do will interact with the repository, mergeinfo, etc.

svn diff tells you what it is going to do, and you can get the
merginfo off the end of a huge diff with tail.

Right now, pleaes do not do anything with this issue until an agreed
on cource of remidiation is determined.  Last time you jumped the gun
before we had concluded discussions.


-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgri...@freebsd.org
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to