In message <[email protected]> , Ian Le pore writes: > On Sun, 2019-03-03 at 12:20 -0800, Enji Cooper wrote: > > > On Mar 3, 2019, at 11:12, Steven Hartland <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Not really much more to say that isn't explained by that and the > > > code. > > > > > > Sure I could have used a different sentence structure for the body > > > but it wouldn't add anything IMO, thoughts? > > > > Why the previous sector size was wrong isnât clear from the > > commit message. Why switch from a sizeof to 0? > > Cheers! > > -Enji > > > > The commit message said it was "incorrect / unused". While a bit terse, > it does communicate that the old value was incorrect (by being there at > all) because the value is unused (so zero more clearly expresses that). > > It's not completely a joke that most English-speaking software > engineers have English as a second language. :)
This is one of those profound quotes that should be in fortune(1). -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <[email protected]> FreeBSD UNIX: <[email protected]> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
