Author: markj
Date: Tue May 14 18:10:32 2019
New Revision: 347569
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/347569

Log:
  Remove redundant -Wl uses from the kernel's LDFLAGS.
  
  No functional change intended.
  
  MFC after:    3 days
  Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation

Modified:
  head/sys/conf/kern.pre.mk
  head/sys/conf/kmod.mk

Modified: head/sys/conf/kern.pre.mk
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/conf/kern.pre.mk   Tue May 14 17:05:02 2019        (r347568)
+++ head/sys/conf/kern.pre.mk   Tue May 14 18:10:32 2019        (r347569)
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ CFLAGS+=    ${GCOV_CFLAGS}
 CFLAGS+=       ${CONF_CFLAGS}
 
 .if defined(LINKER_FEATURES) && ${LINKER_FEATURES:Mbuild-id}
-LDFLAGS+=      -Wl,--build-id=sha1
+LDFLAGS+=      --build-id=sha1
 .endif
 
 .if (${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "aarch64" || ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "amd64" || \
@@ -153,11 +153,11 @@ LDFLAGS+= -Wl,--build-id=sha1
 .error amd64/arm64/i386 kernel requires linker ifunc support
 .endif
 .if ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "amd64"
-LDFLAGS+=      -Wl,-z max-page-size=2097152
+LDFLAGS+=      -z max-page-size=2097152
 .if ${LINKER_TYPE} != "lld"
-LDFLAGS+=      -Wl,-z common-page-size=4096
+LDFLAGS+=      -z common-page-size=4096
 .else
-LDFLAGS+=      -Wl,-z -Wl,ifunc-noplt
+LDFLAGS+=      -z ifunc-noplt
 .endif
 .endif
 

Modified: head/sys/conf/kmod.mk
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/conf/kmod.mk       Tue May 14 17:05:02 2019        (r347568)
+++ head/sys/conf/kmod.mk       Tue May 14 18:10:32 2019        (r347569)
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ CFLAGS+=    -fno-common
 LDFLAGS+=      -d -warn-common
 
 .if defined(LINKER_FEATURES) && ${LINKER_FEATURES:Mbuild-id}
-LDFLAGS+=      -Wl,--build-id=sha1
+LDFLAGS+=      --build-id=sha1
 .endif
 
 CFLAGS+=       ${DEBUG_FLAGS}
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to