On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 12:06:17PM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote: C> On January 15, 2020 2:38:05 PM PST, Gleb Smirnoff <gleb...@freebsd.org> wrote: C> >On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:44:53AM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote: C> >J> On Wed, 15 Jan 2020, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: C> >J> C> >J> > Author: glebius C> >J> > Date: Wed Jan 15 06:05:20 2020 C> >J> > New Revision: 356755 C> >J> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/356755 C> >J> > C> >J> > Log: C> >J> > Introduce NET_EPOCH_CALL() macro and use it everywhere where we C> >free C> >J> > data based on the network epoch. The macro reverses the C> >argument C> >J> > order of epoch_call(9) - first function, then its argument. NFC C> >J> C> >J> Is there some practical impact of changing the argument order or C> >does it C> >J> just seem more natural to you? C> > C> >It is just more natural. I'm suggesting to change prototype of C> >epoch_call() C> >to the same order as well. C> C> Yes. C> C> Are there any ports that might be affected, such as kms-drm or virtualbox-ose-kmod?
I'm not aware of any software outside /usr/src/sys that uses epoch. -- Gleb Smirnoff _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
