On Sun, Mar 07, 2010, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 09:31:39PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > It is right idea. I'll use sysconf(__SC_LINE_MAX) there. > > But currently it does the same (sysconf.c): > > case _SC_LINE_MAX: > > return (LINE_MAX); > ... > > To add more: > > NetBSD uniq grows (contrary, NetBSD comm silently discarding everything > > afterwards). > > OpenBSD uniq just use fgets with 8192. > > GNU uniq grows. > > After thinking a bit more I consider to reimplement unlimited lines here > instead because enforcing POSIX limit was not the main goal of my commit > (it was to remove getwc() which is evil). Someone may deal with the limit > on his own way afterwards.
Good. I think it's better for usability if we avoid artificial limits like this. You can actually just call getline() rather than reinventing the wheel. I've had a wide character version of getline() ready to commit for some time (I just need to find the time to do it), so you won't need to call mbstowcs() as a separate step. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"