Gleb Smirnoff <[email protected]> writes:
> "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" <[email protected]> writes:
> > @@ -63,10 +63,15 @@
> >  static void *
> >  try_dlopen(const char *modfn)
> >  {
> > +   void *dlh;
> >  
> >     if (openpam_check_path_owner_perms(modfn) != 0)
> >             return (NULL);
> > -   return (dlopen(modfn, RTLD_NOW));
> > +   if ((dlh = dlopen(modfn, RTLD_NOW)) == NULL) {
> > +           openpam_log(PAM_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: %s", modfn, dlerror());
> > +           errno = 0;
> > +   }
> > +   return (dlh);
> >  }
>
> Why not PAM_LOG_ERROR?

copy-paste mistake

> >  /*
> > @@ -124,7 +129,8 @@
> >             dlclose(dlh);
> >     FREE(module);
> >  err:
> > -   openpam_log(PAM_LOG_ERROR, "%m");
> > +   if (errno != 0)
> > +           openpam_log(PAM_LOG_ERROR, "%s: %m", path);
> >     return (NULL);
> >  }
>
> I think vpath is better choice here, as explained in previous mail

At this point, vpath is either NULL or garbage.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [email protected]
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to