On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:10:07PM +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:49:51PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 2012-03-30 15:30, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > > >here are a few similar cases. > > > > Hm, what about this one that clang warns about: > > > > sys/dev/asr/asr.c:2420:57: warning: for loop has empty body [-Wempty-body] > > for (ha = &Asr_softc_list; *ha; ha = &((*ha)->ha_next)); > > I would really just move the ha = into the loop body -- same semantic > and no such issue as a dangling ;.
I usually write "continue;" instead of just lonely semicolon. Allows to keep "packed" for's and while's, and does not look ambiguous. ./danfe _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
