Author: kevlo
Date: Mon May 21 07:52:46 2012
New Revision: 235719
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/235719

Log:
  According to shared memory man pages, advice including <sys/types.h>
  instead of <sys/param.h>

Modified:
  head/tools/regression/sysvmsg/msgtest.c
  head/tools/regression/sysvsem/semtest.c
  head/tools/regression/sysvshm/shmtest.c

Modified: head/tools/regression/sysvmsg/msgtest.c
==============================================================================
--- head/tools/regression/sysvmsg/msgtest.c     Mon May 21 07:47:57 2012        
(r235718)
+++ head/tools/regression/sysvmsg/msgtest.c     Mon May 21 07:52:46 2012        
(r235719)
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
  * Test the SVID-compatible Message Queue facility.
  */
 
-#include <sys/param.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/ipc.h>
 #include <sys/msg.h>
 #include <sys/wait.h>

Modified: head/tools/regression/sysvsem/semtest.c
==============================================================================
--- head/tools/regression/sysvsem/semtest.c     Mon May 21 07:47:57 2012        
(r235718)
+++ head/tools/regression/sysvsem/semtest.c     Mon May 21 07:52:46 2012        
(r235719)
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
  * Test the SVID-compatible Semaphore facility.
  */
 
-#include <sys/param.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/ipc.h>
 #include <sys/sem.h>
 #include <sys/wait.h>

Modified: head/tools/regression/sysvshm/shmtest.c
==============================================================================
--- head/tools/regression/sysvshm/shmtest.c     Mon May 21 07:47:57 2012        
(r235718)
+++ head/tools/regression/sysvshm/shmtest.c     Mon May 21 07:52:46 2012        
(r235719)
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
  * Test the SVID-compatible Shared Memory facility.
  */
 
-#include <sys/param.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/ipc.h>
 #include <sys/shm.h>
 #include <sys/wait.h>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to